 |
| A composite monarch? James VI and I, by Daniel Mytens |
In 1992, John Elliott, Regius
Professor of Modern History at Oxford, published a seminal article which I ask
all my students of early modern Europe read – ‘A Europe of Composite Monarchies’
(Past and Present, paywall). Perhaps, at this juncture,
British politicians should read it too.
Elliott pointed out that late
medieval Europe consisted of dozens of small states and statelets – e.g. the
Duchy of Savoy, or Milan – but that in the sixteenth century there was a trend
for political entities to coalesce into bigger units. The marriage
of Ferdinand and Isabella in 1469 forged a union between the Iberian kingdoms
of Castile and Aragon (‘Spain’). The French monarchy came to absorb the duchy of
Brittany. Further east, the marriage of Grand Duke Jogaila of Lithuania to
Queen Jadwiga of Poland in 1386 created a dynastic union between the
two polities, which was cemented into a legal union in 1569. And, in 1603, with
the extinction of the Tudor line, a Scottish monarch travelled south to claim
his English throne, creating an enduring dynastic union in the British Isles.
Elliott’s point was that such unions, or ‘composite states’ were a
quintessential feature of European political life in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, a way of reconciling, as he so eloquently put it, ‘the competing
aspirations towards diversity and unity that have remained a constant of
European history’. Composite states were, he pointed out, both highly fruitful
arrangements and inherently challenging to govern.
Composite states are a hallmark
of early modern Europe, and yet, four centuries later, what is the United Kingdom, if
not a composite state? With its union of three kingdoms (England,
Scotland, and Ireland) and Wales, the
Stuart composite monarchy was one of the more ambitious, or crowded, in Europe.
Alongside Spain (a fusion of Aragon, Castile, Navarre), the UK is one of the
great surviving composite monarchies of the Renaissance age. Others, such as
the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, broke down into competing nation-states
long ago – as Timothy Snyder has traced so well, into modern Poland, Lithuania,
Belarus and Ukraine. Today, we are still dealing with some of the long-term
consequences of that failed composite state. If the Scots vote yes tomorrow, we
will be leaving early modern Europe a little further behind us, shaking off one
of its powerful legacies.
And regardless of the referendum
result, British politicians would also do well to read Conrad Russell’s The Fall of the British Monarchies, 1637-42
(1991). In this classic work, Russell demonstrated how the English civil war
was sparked by riots in Edinburgh – he charted how quickly different parts of a
union can destabilise each other, and how bad policy in Scotland triggered a
spiral of local reactions and events across the British Isles, which a London
government proved quite unable to control. History can’t predict the future,
but it can give us insightful and salutary models to think with – scholars,
voters and politicians alike. Composite states are relatively easy to forge,
messy to maintain, and messy to dismantle.
 |
| Sigismund Augustus, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (d. 1572). |
